History of the origin of cement:
Early
uses
An early version of cement made with
lime, sand, and gravel was used in Mesopotamia in the third millennium B.C. and
later in Egypt. It is uncertain where it was first discovered that a
combination of hydrated non-hydraulic lime and a pozzolan produces a hydraulic
mixture (see also: Pozzolanic reaction), but concrete made from such mixtures
was first used by the Ancient Macedonians and three centuries later
on a large scale by Roman engineers. They used both natural pozzolans (trass or
pumice) and artificial pozzolans (ground brick or pottery) in these concretes.
Many excellent examples of structures made from these concretes are still
standing, notably the huge dome of the Pantheon in Rome and the massive Baths
of Caracalla. The vast system of Roman aqueducts also made extensive use of
hydraulic cement.
1.
Although any preservation of this
knowledge in literary sources from the Middle Ages is unknown, medieval masons
and some military engineers maintained an active tradition of using hydraulic
cement in structures such as canals, fortresses, harbors, and shipbuilding
facilities. The technical knowledge of making hydraulic cement was later
formalized by French and British engineers in the 18th century.
Modern
cements
Modern hydraulic cements began to be
developed from the start of the Industrial Revolution (around 1800), driven by
three main needs:
- Hydraulic cement render (stucco) for finishing brick buildings in wet climates.
- Hydraulic mortars for masonry construction of harbor works, etc., in contact with sea water.
- Development of strong concretes.
In Britain particularly, good
quality building stone became ever more expensive during a period of rapid
growth, and it became a common practice to construct prestige buildings from
the new industrial bricks, and to finish them with a stucco to imitate stone.
Hydraulic limes were favored for this, but the need for a fast set time
encouraged the development of new cements. Most famous was Parker's "Roman
cement".This was developed by James Parker in the 1780s, and finally
patented in 1796. It was, in fact, nothing like material used by the Romans,
but was a "Natural cement" made by burning septaria – nodules that are found in
certain clay deposits, and that contain both clay minerals and calcium
carbonate. The burnt nodules were ground to a fine powder. This product, made
into a mortar with sand, set in 5–15 minutes. The success of "Roman
Cement" led other manufacturers to develop rival products by burning
artificial mixtures of clay and chalk.
The National Cement Share Company of
Ethiopia's new plant in Dire Dawa.
John Smeaton made an important
contribution to the development of cements when he was planning the
construction of the third Eddystone Lighthouse (1755–9) in the English Channel.
He needed a hydraulic mortar that would set and develop some strength in the
twelve hour period between successive high tides. He performed an exhaustive
market research on the available hydraulic limes, visiting their production
sites, and noted that the "hydraulicity" of the lime was directly
related to the clay content of the limestone from which it was made. Smeaton
was a civil engineer by profession, and took the idea no further. Apparently
unaware of Smeaton's work, the same principle was identified by Louis Vicat in the
first decade of the nineteenth century. Vicat went on to devise a method of
combining chalk and clay into an intimate mixture, and, burning this, produced
an "artificial cement" in 1817. James Frost, working in Britain,
produced what he called "British cement" in a similar manner around
the same time, but did not obtain a patent until 1822. In 1824, Joseph Aspdin
patented a similar material, which he called Portland cement, because the
render made from it was in color similar to the prestigious Portland stone.
Setting time and "early
strength" are important characteristics of cements. Hydraulic limes,
"natural" cements, and "artificial" cements all rely upon
their belite content for strength development. Belite develops strength slowly.
Because they were burned at temperatures below 1250 °C, they contained no alite,
which is responsible for early strength in modern cements. The first cement to
consistently contain alite was made by Joseph Aspdin's son William in the early
1840s. This was what we call today "modern" Portland cement. Because
of the air of mystery with which William Aspdin surrounded his product, others
(e.g., Vicat and I.C. Johnson) have claimed precedence in this
invention, but recent analysis of
both his concrete and raw cement have shown that William Aspdin's product made
at Northfleet, Kent was a true alite-based cement. However, Aspdin's methods
were "rule-of-thumb": Vicat is responsible for establishing the
chemical basis of these cements, and Johnson established the importance of sintering
the mix in the kiln.
William Aspdin's innovation was
counterintuitive for manufacturers of "artificial cements", because
they required more lime in the mix (a problem for his father), a much higher
kiln temperature (and therefore more fuel), and the resulting clinker was very
hard and rapidly wore down the millstones, which were the only available
grinding technology of the time. Manufacturing costs were therefore
considerably higher, but the product set reasonably slowly and developed
strength quickly, thus opening up a market for use in concrete. The use of
concrete in construction grew rapidly from 1850 onward, and was soon the
dominant use for cements. Thus Portland cement began its predominant role.
Around the same time in Russia, Egor
Cheliev created a new binder by mixing lime and clay. His results were
published in 1822 in his book A Treatise on the Art to Prepare a Good Mortar
published in St. Petersburg. A few years later in 1825, he published another
book, which described the various methods of making cement and concrete, as
well as the benefits of cement in the construction of buildings and
embankments.
In the US the first large scale use
of cement was Rosendale cement, a natural cement mined from a massive deposit
of a large dolostone rock deposit discovered in the early 19th century near Rosendale,
New York. Rosendale cement was extremely popular for the foundation of
buildings (e.g., Statue of Liberty, Capitol Building, Brooklyn Bridge)
and lining water pipes. But its long curing time of at least a month made it
unpopular after World War One in the construction of highways and bridges and
many states and construction firms turned to the use of Portland cement.
Because of the switch to Portland cement, by the end of the 1920s of the 15
Rosendale cement companies, only one had survived. But in the early 1930s it
was discovered that, while Portland cement had a faster setting time it was not
as durable, especially for highways, to the point that some states stopped
building highways and roads with cement. Bertrain H. Wait, an engineer whose
company had worked on the construction of the New York City's Catskill Aqueduct,
was impressed with the durability of Rosendale cement, and came up with a blend
of both Rosendale and synthetic cements which had the good attributes of both:
it was highly durable and had a much faster setting time. Mr. Wait convinced
the New York Commissioner of Highways to construct an experimental section of
highway near New Paltz, New York, using one sack of Rosendale to six sacks of
synthetic cement. It was proved a success and for decades the
Rosendale-synthetic cement blend became common use in highway and bridge
construction.
No comments:
Post a Comment